I will then give a proof that the set of rational numbers forms a field. If you need a review of fields, check out here.
Definition 1: Set of rational numbers
We can define the set of rational numbers as the ordered pair of integers (a,b) where a,b are integers and b ≠ 0.
Definition 2: Addition of rationals
(a,b) + (c,d) = (ad + bc, bd)
Definition 3: Multiplication of rationals
(a,b) * (c,d) = (ac,bd)
Definition 4: Equality of rationals
Two rational numbers (a,b) and (c,d) are equal if and only if ad=bc.
Definition 5: Comparison of rationals
(a,b) is less than (c,d) if and only if abd2 is less than b2cd.
Lemma 1: All integers can be represented as rational numbers
(1) Any integer x can be represented as (x,1) [see definition 1 above]
(2) This correspondence holds over addition
x + y = z if and only if (x,1) + (y,1) = (x*1+y*1,1*1) = (x+y,1) = (z,1)
(3) This correspondence holds over multiplication
x*y = z if and only if (x,1)*(y,1) = (xy,1*1) = (xy,1) = (z,1)
QED
Lemma 2: The set of rational numbers is closed on addition
Proof:
(1) The integers are closed on addition [see Lemma 1, here] and multiplication [see Lemma 2, here].
(2) So, it follows from Definition 2 above that the rational numbers are closed on addition.
QED
Lemma 3: The set of rational numbers is closed on multiplication
Proof:
The follows directly from Definition 3 and the fact that the integers are closed on multiplication [see Lemma 2, here].
QED
Lemma 4: The set of rational numbers satisfy the Commutative Rule for Addition
Proof:
(1) From Definition 2 above:
(a,b) + (c,d) = (ad + bc, bd)
(2) Since integers are commutative by addition (see Lemma 7, here):
(ad + bc, bd) = (bc + ad, bd)
(3) From Definition 2 again, we get:
(bc + ad,bd) = (c,d) + (a,b)
QED
Lemma 5: The set of rational numbers satisfy the Associative Rule for Addition
Proof:
From Definition 2 above:
[(a,b) + (c,d)] + (e,f) = (ad+bc,bd) + (e,f) = (adf+bcf + bde,bdf) = (a,b) + (cf + de,df) =
= (a,b) + [(cf + de,df)] = (a,b) + [(c,d) + (e,f)]
QED
Lemma 6: The set of rational numbers has an Additive Identity for all elements.
Proof:
(1) Using Definition 2 above, we have:
(a,b) + (0,c) = (a*c + 0*b,b*c) = (ac,bc)
(2) Using Definition 4 above, we note that:
(ac,bc) = (a,b) since acb = bca [using the commutative property multiplication for integers, see Lemma 8, here]
QED
Lemma 7: The set of rational numbers has an Additive Inverse for all elements.
Proof:
(1) Let (a,b) be a rational number.
(2) Then, it's additive inverse is (-a,b) since:
(a,b) + (-a,b) = (a*b + -a*b,b*b) = (ab-ab,b*b) = (0,b*b)
QED
Lemma 8: The set of rational numbers supports the Associative Rule for Multiplication
Proof:
Using Definition 3 above, we have:
[(a,b)*(c,d)]*(e,f) = [(ac,bd)]*(e,f) = (ace,bdf) = (a,b)*[(ce,df)] = (a,b)*[(c,d)*(e,f)]
QED
Lemma 9: (c,c) = (1,1)
Proof:
The follows directly from definition 4 above since:
c*1 = 1*c
QED
Lemma 10: The set of rational numbers supports the Distributive Rule
Proof:
(1) Using Definition 2 and Definition 3 above, we have:
(a,b)[(c,d) + (e,f)] = (a,b)*(cf+de,df) = (acf + ade,bdf)
(2) Using Definition 3 above and Lemma 8 above, we have:
(acbf + aebd,bdbf) = (b,b)*(acf + aed,bdf) = (1,1)*(acf + aed,bdf) = (acf + aed,bdf)
(3) Using Definition 2 above, we have:
(ac,bd) + (ae,bf) = (acbf + aebd,bdbf)
QED
Lemma 11: The set of rational numbers supports the Commutative Rule for Multiplication
Proof:
(1) Using Definition 3 above, we have:
(a,b)*(c,d) = (ac,bd)
(2) Using the Commutative Property of Multiplication for Integers (see Lemma 8, here):
(ac,bd) = (ca,db)
(3) Using Definition 3 above, we have:
(ca,db) = (c,d)*(a,b)
QED
Lemma 12: The set of rational numbers has a Multiplicative Identity
Proof:
For any rational number (a,b), we have (see Definition 3 above):
(a,b)*(1,1) = (a*1,b*1) = (a,b)
QED
Lemma 13: For every nonzero element, the set of rational numbers has a Multiplicative Inverse
Proof:
(1) Let (a,b) be any rational number.
(2) Then (b,a) will be its multiplicative inverse since:
(a,b)*(b,a) = (ab,ba)
(3) Using the Commutative Property of Multiplication of Integers (see Lemma 8, here), we have:
(ab,ba) = (ab,ab)
(4) Using Lemma 8 above, we have (ab,ab)=1.
QED
Theorem 14: The set of rational numbers forms a field
Proof:
This follows directly from Lemma 2 through Lemma 13 above and from Definition 3, here.
QED
References
- "Rational Numbers", Wikipedia.Org
- Bruce E. Meserve, Fundamental Concepts of Algebra
, Dover Books, 1981.
2 comments:
Dear Sir,
I don't understand how can the set of rational numbers form a field, as the Property of Reciprocals doesn't hold true, because the reciprocal of 9/10 is an irrational number. Could you tell me whether or not you disagree, and please explain why?
Thank you,
Amir Mahallati
Hi Amirmahallati,
The reciprocal of a nonzero rational number is also rational.
The reciprocal of 9/10 is 10/9.
Remember 1/(a/b) = (b/a).
-Larry
Post a Comment