I will then give a proof that the set of rational numbers forms a field. If you need a review of fields, check out here.
Definition 1: Set of rational numbers
We can define the set of rational numbers as the ordered pair of integers (a,b) where a,b are integers and b ≠ 0.
Definition 2: Addition of rationals
(a,b) + (c,d) = (ad + bc, bd)
Definition 3: Multiplication of rationals
(a,b) * (c,d) = (ac,bd)
Definition 4: Equality of rationals
Two rational numbers (a,b) and (c,d) are equal if and only if ad=bc.
Definition 5: Comparison of rationals
(a,b) is less than (c,d) if and only if abd2 is less than b2cd.
Lemma 1: All integers can be represented as rational numbers
(1) Any integer x can be represented as (x,1) [see definition 1 above]
(2) This correspondence holds over addition
x + y = z if and only if (x,1) + (y,1) = (x*1+y*1,1*1) = (x+y,1) = (z,1)
(3) This correspondence holds over multiplication
x*y = z if and only if (x,1)*(y,1) = (xy,1*1) = (xy,1) = (z,1)
QED
Lemma 2: The set of rational numbers is closed on addition
Proof:
(1) The integers are closed on addition [see Lemma 1, here] and multiplication [see Lemma 2, here].
(2) So, it follows from Definition 2 above that the rational numbers are closed on addition.
QED
Lemma 3: The set of rational numbers is closed on multiplication
Proof:
The follows directly from Definition 3 and the fact that the integers are closed on multiplication [see Lemma 2, here].
QED
Lemma 4: The set of rational numbers satisfy the Commutative Rule for Addition
Proof:
(1) From Definition 2 above:
(a,b) + (c,d) = (ad + bc, bd)
(2) Since integers are commutative by addition (see Lemma 7, here):
(ad + bc, bd) = (bc + ad, bd)
(3) From Definition 2 again, we get:
(bc + ad,bd) = (c,d) + (a,b)
QED
Lemma 5: The set of rational numbers satisfy the Associative Rule for Addition
Proof:
From Definition 2 above:
[(a,b) + (c,d)] + (e,f) = (ad+bc,bd) + (e,f) = (adf+bcf + bde,bdf) = (a,b) + (cf + de,df) =
= (a,b) + [(cf + de,df)] = (a,b) + [(c,d) + (e,f)]
QED
Lemma 6: The set of rational numbers has an Additive Identity for all elements.
Proof:
(1) Using Definition 2 above, we have:
(a,b) + (0,c) = (a*c + 0*b,b*c) = (ac,bc)
(2) Using Definition 4 above, we note that:
(ac,bc) = (a,b) since acb = bca [using the commutative property multiplication for integers, see Lemma 8, here]
QED
Lemma 7: The set of rational numbers has an Additive Inverse for all elements.
Proof:
(1) Let (a,b) be a rational number.
(2) Then, it's additive inverse is (-a,b) since:
(a,b) + (-a,b) = (a*b + -a*b,b*b) = (ab-ab,b*b) = (0,b*b)
QED
Lemma 8: The set of rational numbers supports the Associative Rule for Multiplication
Proof:
Using Definition 3 above, we have:
[(a,b)*(c,d)]*(e,f) = [(ac,bd)]*(e,f) = (ace,bdf) = (a,b)*[(ce,df)] = (a,b)*[(c,d)*(e,f)]
QED
Lemma 9: (c,c) = (1,1)
Proof:
The follows directly from definition 4 above since:
c*1 = 1*c
QED
Lemma 10: The set of rational numbers supports the Distributive Rule
Proof:
(1) Using Definition 2 and Definition 3 above, we have:
(a,b)[(c,d) + (e,f)] = (a,b)*(cf+de,df) = (acf + ade,bdf)
(2) Using Definition 3 above and Lemma 8 above, we have:
(acbf + aebd,bdbf) = (b,b)*(acf + aed,bdf) = (1,1)*(acf + aed,bdf) = (acf + aed,bdf)
(3) Using Definition 2 above, we have:
(ac,bd) + (ae,bf) = (acbf + aebd,bdbf)
QED
Lemma 11: The set of rational numbers supports the Commutative Rule for Multiplication
Proof:
(1) Using Definition 3 above, we have:
(a,b)*(c,d) = (ac,bd)
(2) Using the Commutative Property of Multiplication for Integers (see Lemma 8, here):
(ac,bd) = (ca,db)
(3) Using Definition 3 above, we have:
(ca,db) = (c,d)*(a,b)
QED
Lemma 12: The set of rational numbers has a Multiplicative Identity
Proof:
For any rational number (a,b), we have (see Definition 3 above):
(a,b)*(1,1) = (a*1,b*1) = (a,b)
QED
Lemma 13: For every nonzero element, the set of rational numbers has a Multiplicative Inverse
Proof:
(1) Let (a,b) be any rational number.
(2) Then (b,a) will be its multiplicative inverse since:
(a,b)*(b,a) = (ab,ba)
(3) Using the Commutative Property of Multiplication of Integers (see Lemma 8, here), we have:
(ab,ba) = (ab,ab)
(4) Using Lemma 8 above, we have (ab,ab)=1.
QED
Theorem 14: The set of rational numbers forms a field
Proof:
This follows directly from Lemma 2 through Lemma 13 above and from Definition 3, here.
QED
References
- "Rational Numbers", Wikipedia.Org
- Bruce E. Meserve, Fundamental Concepts of Algebra, Dover Books, 1981.
4 comments :
Dear Sir,
I don't understand how can the set of rational numbers form a field, as the Property of Reciprocals doesn't hold true, because the reciprocal of 9/10 is an irrational number. Could you tell me whether or not you disagree, and please explain why?
Thank you,
Amir Mahallati
Hi Amirmahallati,
The reciprocal of a nonzero rational number is also rational.
The reciprocal of 9/10 is 10/9.
Remember 1/(a/b) = (b/a).
-Larry
This blog is full of knowledge.Rational numbers is a very important topic of mathematics.Any student can understand the application of rational numbers from this blog.board of gujarat syllabus
Hi, Amirmahallati, the Rationals are all fractions that terminate or have recurring decimals. the ones which don't recur and also do not terminate are irrational.
Post a Comment