Postulate 1: Law of Trichotomy
For any two values x,y, there are only three possible states:
(a) x = y
(b) x is less than y
(c) x is greater than y
This is one of the postulates of real numbers. See here for details on constructing real numbers.
Lemma 1: Similar polygons inscribed in circles are to one another as the squares on their diameters
Proof:
(1) By assumption, polygon ABCDE is similar to polygon FGHKL with BM and GN being the diameters of circles.
(2) From the property of similar polygon (see definition above), we have:
∠ BAE ≅ ∠ GFL
BA/AE = GF/GL
(3) triangle ABE is equiangular to triangle FGL [See Lemma 1 here for details]
(4) Since they are equiangular, we know that:
∠ AEB ≅ ∠ FLG
(5) Since both angles open on the same length of the circumference (see here):
∠ AEB ≅ ∠ AMB
∠ FLG ≅ ∠ FNG
(6) From (4) and (5), we can conclude that:
∠ AMB ≅ ∠ FNG
(7) Since BM and GN are both diameters of the circle (see here),
we can conclude that both ∠ BAM and ∠ GFN are right angles.
(8) Since the angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees (see Lemma 4 here), we can conclude from step #6 and step #7 that triangle ABM is equiangular to triangle FGN.
(9) From the properties of equiangular triangles (see Lemma 3 here), we know that:
BM/GN = BA/GF
(10) From (9), we can conclude that:
(BM/GN)2 = (BA/GF)2 = BM2/GN2 = BA2/GF2
(11) From similar polygons (See Theorem here), we know that:
(Area of ABCDE)/(Area of FGHKL) = BA2/GF2
(12) Putting this all together, gives us:
BM2/GN2 = (Area of ABCDE)/(Area of FGHKL)
QED
Lemma 2: if A/B = C/D with A greater than C, then D is less than B.
Proof:
(1) Let A/B = C/D with A greater than C.
(2) So that AD = BC
(3) Now, D ≠ B since if D = B, then AD is greater than BC which contradicts step #2.
(4) Now, D cannot be greater than B since then AD is greater than BC which contradicts step #2.
(5) So, by the Law of Trichotomy (see Postulate above), we can conclude that D is less than B.
QED
Theorem: Two circles are to each other as the squares of their diameters.
Proof:
(1) Let C1 be the circle formed with diameter BD and area A1.
(2) Let C2 be the circle formed with diameter FH and area A2.
(3) Assume that A1/A2 ≠ (BD)2/(FH)2
(4) There exists an area S such that: (BD)2/(FH)2 = A1/S
(5) Assume that S is less than A2
(6) Then, there exists a polygon EKFLGMHN such that the area of this polygon is greater than the area of S. [From the Method of Exhaustion, see Lemma 2.]
(7) We can inscribe a similar polygon into circle C1 [See here for details on this construction]
(8) From Lemma 1 above, we can conclude:
BD2/FH2 = (Area polygon AOBPCQDR)/(Area polygon EKFLGMHN)
(9) But then, from step #4:
BD2/FH2= A1/S
(10) So we can conclude that:
(Area polygon AOBPCQDR)/(Area polygon EKFLGMNH) = A1/S
(11) Since A1 is greater than Area polygon AOBPCQDR, we can conclude from step #15 that S is greater than Area polygon EKFLGMN from Lemma 3 above.
(12) But this is impossible since in step #6 we showed that S is less than this same regular polygon so we have a contradiction and we reject our assumption in step #5.
(13) Now, let's assume that S is greater than A2
(14) So this means that (FH)2/(BD)2 = S/A1
(15) Let T be the area such that S/A1 = A2/T
(16) We can see that T is less than A1 from Lemma 2 above.
(17) There exists a regular polygon that is greater in area than T but smaller than the area of the circle by the Method of Exhaustion (see Lemma 2)
(18) We can inscribe a similar polygon in A2.
(19) From Lemma 1 above, we can conclude:
FH2/BD2 = (Area polygon EKFLGMHN)/(Area polygon AOBPCQDR)
(20) Likewise from step #14, we have:
(FH)2/(BD)2 = S/A1
(21) And from step #15, this means that:
(Area polygon EKFLGMNH)/(Area polygon AOBPCQDR) = A2/T
(22) Now A2 is greater in area than polygon EKFLGMNH so that T must be greater than the area of polygon AOBPCQDR
(23) But this is impossible from step #17 so we have a contradiction and we reject step #13.
(29) We now apply the Law of Trichotomy (see Postulate above) and we are done.
QED
References
- Phil Schultz, Eudoxus's Proof that the area of a circle is a constant times diameter squared
- David Joyce, Euclid's Elements
No comments :
Post a Comment